[Internal-cg] Overlaps/implications of CWG proposal for RIRs/IETF
Martin.Boyle at nominet.org.uk
Sat Apr 25 19:51:30 UTC 2015
I agree with Jon and Patrik.
I'd also note that the CWG has discussed jurisdiction and decided not to make a decision at this stage, as it would complicate the discussion. The CSC, if I remember correctly, is simply a standing committee and would not have a legal identity of its own. It is not set up to make decisions, for example.
Incidentally, I think that when you reference a Geneva jurisdiction, you really are not looking at something under Swiss law, but at a regime more akin to an inter-governmental organisation's - sort of ICRC or FIFA models, neither of which has been without serious accountability and trust issues.
From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Patrik Fältström
Sent: 25 April 2015 14:53
To: Jon Nevett
Cc: internal-cg at ianacg.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Overlaps/implications of CWG proposal for RIRs/IETF
On 25 Apr 2015, at 15:38, Jon Nevett wrote:
> I don't support the addition in which we suggest a different jurisdiction.
Once again, we as ICG should not and can not propose any specific solution or changes. If ICG members or their organizations do have specific views, by all means do submit such things via whatever mechanism the OC have suggested.
More information about the Internal-cg