kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Mon Apr 27 15:29:09 UTC 2015
Thank you very much for clarifications which is highly appreciated
Yes, I need to carefully read the slides including nos .18- 22
The difficulties that faced was the telegraphic nature of the message
Your clarifications were quite helpful .
I will revert back to you soon
Sent from my iPhone
> On 27 Apr 2015, at 16:48, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
> The problem we are trying to address is that negotiations and claims are being made out of public view, in an attempt to change the operational community proposals behind the scenes. ICG has the responsibility to uphold the openness and transparency of the process. Alissa proposed, and Patrik and I supported, a simple statement that discussions and negotiations about the merits of the proposals should be out in the open.
> It appears to me that you are unfamiliar with the problems that led to Alissa’s proposal. Before you suggest “no action” I suggest you spend some time reviewing slides 18-20 of the presentation made by members of the CRISP team at this link: (no need to read the whole thing) https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_35/PDF/monday/crisp_panel.pdf
> If you wish to intervene heavily in this discussion it is essential that you read that material first. Once you have read that, please tell me if you still think “no action” is needed.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg