kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Wed Apr 29 21:43:13 UTC 2015
Sorry you misunderstood the main part of my comment.
Please kindly read it again
2015-04-29 23:00 GMT+02:00 <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de>:
> Dear Kavouss,
> I understand also ICG commenting from a perspective taking into
> consideration all the three communities providing proposals. Each of these
> 3 elements is important to be prepared for fitting together. Thus I think
> ICG has a responsibility to take care about. If there is a feeling that our
> target may be endangered due to the treatment of one of the elements we
> should mention this.
> Best regards
> Sent from my personal phone
> Am 29.04.2015 um 19:59 schrieb Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
> Dear Wolf, Please kindly read my comments .I agree with the issue burt I
> have difficulties to accept why ICG becomes spokeman of the Two Communities
> while the draft is on commenting period and every one including those two
> communities may raise any concerns but not in the name of ICG.
> We are not caretaker of Protocol and numbers commujnities.
> Such mission is not given in our charetr to us.
> We should remain neuteral visd a vis all three communities and not as an
> altering entity for any communities.
> They are expert, matured and well informed.
> We have not recieved any thing from CWG .
> 2015-04-29 18:59 GMT+02:00 Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <wuknoben at gmail.com>:
>> I also agree to Alissa's draft. I wonder whether it shouldn't read
>> "...including ICANN staff and board..."
>> Best regards
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg