[Internal-cg] "Alternatives"

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Fri Jun 26 18:47:42 UTC 2015

Pls read my mail

Sent from my iPhone

> On 26 Jun 2015, at 06:26, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> After more reflection I still do not support this.
> I understand the motivation of NTIA and the arguments in favour. They
> do not convince me that we should do extra work or add extra words:
> I remain convinced that all we need is a description of transition and
> the post-transition state plus a description of the process to develop
> this description. We should describe our own process and provide
> pointers to the public record of how the customer communities
> developed their responses to us. Their record already includes the
> principles they developed and discussions about alternatives. We can
> ask for *specific* clarification by the communities if we feel
> something is missing from their response to us or from the existing
> public record.
> Of course we should add our evaluation whether the process and the
> result meet the criteria set out at the beginning.
> There is no need for us to re-tell the story of how the proposals were
> developed. Re-telling the story is unnecessary work which also has a
> great risk of changing the story, even unintentionally. We should not
> expose ourselves to the risk of causing confusion or maybe even
> failure by re-interpreting the public record of the communities.
> Re-telling also creates more words. As you know I advocate the minimum
> number of words possible.
> We should not invent new requirements or criteria on the fly unless we
> have very strong consensus in the ICG that they are absolutely
> necessary for our deliverable and they were not foreseeable at the
> outset. Asking the communities at this point for the a description of
> the alternatives they considered is such a new requirement and I do
> not consider it necessary.
> Daniel
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
> iQIVAwUBVY0attDY5Emqa716AQIzWg//QmA1mgSvsv43gK1t0dKgdii5XB3IyheZ
> ma0AM9Lw4xGm49sCE+CXOYaWYJDLFOdpePdt6RUowuP0R1upGP9f5Uiu5c2AsL8T
> 8QwsYVtbyhL27c5Y1JlTRiuZ3eufGT6l7ZWiicowvEnvluuRexyM0wY3J08FVivz
> 2oQZ5d0m445HcK4HUpyLjEBQzsQiLz+Rr5itdp4Bc7gweJsHvu7UclXoJROeC+KB
> ttlUB9r+H23KsInepqrVYj/InITwh1eaIF2hmOopqU3vSRQy9KuD4juDOplcFXE0
> qlQuY83rRxZcJSaoCcbiCHPS/2pmqUXV9QaF1GTEL7ZfZuZVbxQNo9csDH6E39ib
> psQvXMI/3AKVNfzd4eIxtXYSuArB+5XmdLWstRF3jDeX7xcx5wUhksG99BbOe/rw
> uP3i+gumQRRqS3+tg7U6cEZcSRYKhLB55nQ/A15Pds/KUlGnVJzbCMb9sT4Ho9ns
> QpMEabi3BhzwyOIxiytsnWkUA7esKLyOsuHHUFTjvfTtplhU47GJZI868vZsnEJv
> iV9lL+PQXnsLpn+LIpU/U/UCf1q73Ne/Drx59DmHAl7tQ28rZFTjGFQJeC4gy930
> P+FENPrpRaAYT+jF/x3gS5h1f5tGBQoU10IzXcWG/1/69RNJXYDm7wj44UGsVJua
> a7w1xDjZc9g=
> =cnp9
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list