[Internal-cg] Fwd: Information requested

Daniel Karrenberg daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Sun Mar 8 16:58:47 UTC 2015


Both responses we have in hand sufficiently address the accountability
chain of the IANA functions operator both present and proposed. Unless
we ask specific questions we will get the same answers that are already
contained in the responses and other relevant normative documents.
Therefore I strongly oppose to ICG asking further general questions
about accountability.

If members of the ICG have concrete questions about accountability,
please raise them here. In a first step we can see if the answers are
contained in the documents we already have or if other ICG members can
answer the questions sufficiently. Only if and when we have consensus
that additional clarification is needed beyond this should we formally
ask questions to the communities.

This is our agreed procedure and I fully support the chair's treatment
of Mr. Arasteh's message.


On 8.03.15 9:47 , Patrik Fältström wrote:
> All,
> This I treat as a request from an ICG member for further explanation by
> other ICG members.
>    Patrik
> Begin forwarded message:
>> *From:* Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
>> <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>>
>> *Date:* 8 mars 2015 08:30:25 CET
>> *To:* Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se <mailto:paf at frobbit.se>>, 
>> Mohamed El Bashir <mbashir at mbash.net <mailto:mbashir at mbash.net>>,
>> Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in <mailto:alissa at cooperw.in>>
>> *Subject:* *Information requested*
>> À *Patrik*, *Mohamed*, Alissa, WUKnoben, ICG
>> Step 2 ,ICG Assessement of Cummunity proposals
>> Dear Vice chair,
>> May you please ask Jari and Alan Barret or Paul Wilson to provide the
>> foloowings;
>> A COMPARATIVE Table indicating the prcess of accountability currently
>> in force and implemented and those which will be required after
>> Transitiion.
>> It would be useful to have that comparative Table enabling ICG Members
>> to better undersatnd how the accountability of Protocol Parameter and
>> Numbers are affected by Transition.
>> The reports of these two communities are difficult to make such a
>> comparision.
>> Without that I will have serious difficulties to comment on the
>> exacteness and appropriateness of the content of these two comminities
>> on accountability before and after transition.
>> By the way, Jari promised to provide a graphic Diagram regarding
>> internal accountability being carried out by IETF
>> mOREOVER, aLAN bARRET / Paul Wilson ,are respectfully requested to
>> provide similar graphic Diagram about the accountability currently in
>> force in RIRs ,in particular  that RIRs have a more decentralized
>> process of five regional communities and the overall accountabilities
>> of the entire  Rir s are not clear
>> Rergards
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at ianacg.org
> http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list