[Internal-cg] Fwd: Information requested

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Sun Mar 8 18:20:54 UTC 2015

Dear Daniel,
Thank you very much for the reply,
I have just asked that the accountability before and after transition be
uin a clear manner be contained i/ presented in  a tabular form.
I do not believe that there is a need to present or express opposition
strong or soft rather to help to understand
Position of some colleaguzes  and their hurry up attitude are known and no
need to resubmit that again
Instead of strong opposition we need to provide information I hope soem
distiguished people take a more friendly and more flexibble approach.
We are a team and should work as a team and should understand each others'
problem and views
We should have valid reasons for strong objections
Can som,ebody tell me who from those various emnities mentioned in  reply
from  protocol  and parametr community are dealing with accountability in a
hierarchical approach
Let us work together
Have nice end of Sunday

2015-03-08 17:58 GMT+01:00 Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>:

> Colleagues,
> Both responses we have in hand sufficiently address the accountability
> chain of the IANA functions operator both present and proposed. Unless
> we ask specific questions we will get the same answers that are already
> contained in the responses and other relevant normative documents.
> Therefore I strongly oppose to ICG asking further general questions
> about accountability.
> If members of the ICG have concrete questions about accountability,
> please raise them here. In a first step we can see if the answers are
> contained in the documents we already have or if other ICG members can
> answer the questions sufficiently. Only if and when we have consensus
> that additional clarification is needed beyond this should we formally
> ask questions to the communities.
> This is our agreed procedure and I fully support the chair's treatment
> of Mr. Arasteh's message.
> Daniel
> On 8.03.15 9:47 , Patrik Fältström wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > This I treat as a request from an ICG member for further explanation by
> > other ICG members.
> >
> >    Patrik
> >
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> >> *From:* Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
> >> <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>>
> >> *Date:* 8 mars 2015 08:30:25 CET
> >> *To:* Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se <mailto:paf at frobbit.se>>,
> >> Mohamed El Bashir <mbashir at mbash.net <mailto:mbashir at mbash.net>>,
> >> Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in <mailto:alissa at cooperw.in>>
> >> *Subject:* *Information requested*
> >>
> >> À *Patrik*, *Mohamed*, Alissa, WUKnoben, ICG
> >>
> >> Step 2 ,ICG Assessement of Cummunity proposals
> >> Dear Vice chair,
> >> May you please ask Jari and Alan Barret or Paul Wilson to provide the
> >> foloowings;
> >> A COMPARATIVE Table indicating the prcess of accountability currently
> >> in force and implemented and those which will be required after
> >> Transitiion.
> >> It would be useful to have that comparative Table enabling ICG Members
> >> to better undersatnd how the accountability of Protocol Parameter and
> >> Numbers are affected by Transition.
> >> The reports of these two communities are difficult to make such a
> >> comparision.
> >> Without that I will have serious difficulties to comment on the
> >> exacteness and appropriateness of the content of these two comminities
> >> on accountability before and after transition.
> >> By the way, Jari promised to provide a graphic Diagram regarding
> >> internal accountability being carried out by IETF
> >> mOREOVER, aLAN bARRET / Paul Wilson ,are respectfully requested to
> >> provide similar graphic Diagram about the accountability currently in
> >> force in RIRs ,in particular  that RIRs have a more decentralized
> >> process of five regional communities and the overall accountabilities
> >> of the entire  Rir s are not clear
> >> Rergards
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Internal-cg mailing list
> > Internal-cg at ianacg.org
> > http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at ianacg.org
> http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150308/b31bf0af/attachment.html>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list