[Internal-cg] [SPAM] Fwd: Information requested

Jari Arkko jari.arkko at piuha.net
Mon Mar 9 21:38:05 UTC 2015

For what it is worth, I have promised to prepare a graph that shows
the different organisations involved in the protocol parameters case,
and shows in graphical form also the accountability mechanisms. I
promised to do that because I have a feeling that it will be useful
in other contexts as well, including various presentations. I’m 
working on it, but we also have a ton of actual technology
work at the IETF that also consumes our time :-)

As for the comparisons, and further explanations, I’m always
available for questions, and going into details. But I think I
would like to avoid re-stating the IETF proposal in new ways,
mostly because I probably wouldn’t do full justice to what the
community wanted to say after careful deliberations :-)
Agreeing with Russ and Daniel as well.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150309/281f8cfb/attachment.asc>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list