kuoweiwu at gmail.com
Sat May 2 17:32:51 UTC 2015
As IETF and NRO making their update information recently, that is what happened as Milton questioned. As I checked with board and ICANN staff, ICANN has no intention to change the proposals from IETF and CRISP, and strongly support ICG working on its proposal based on IETF and CRISP delivered (also the potential proposal from CWG) again. I have nothing more to add than the information from IETF and NRO.
從我的 iPhone 傳送
> Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> 於 2015年5月3日 01:08 寫道：
> Dear Wu
> Thanks for your bon office
> Sent from my iPhone
>> On 28 Apr 2015, at 16:23, Wu Kuo <kuoweiwu at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for sharing your information. I just back from a trip, and arrived home few minutes ago. I will read it ASAP.
>> But I have to say, ICANN has MOU with NRO and IETF for years as you know. This is not a secret at all. Again, I have to read the information you gave, and get back to ICG ASAP.
>> Kuo Wu
>> 從我的 iPhone 傳送
>>> Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> 於 2015年4月28日 22:17 寫道：
>>> Here is Alissa's original message.
>>> You might also be interested in my recent blog post on the topic
>>> It is not about whether ICANN can "stop ICG's action" it is about whether it can unilaterally dictate changes in the operational community proposals, effectively circumventing the ICG process.
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> I didn't read the statement from Alissa yet. I will response after I read
>>>> it. And ICG is an independent group, unless ICG want to get comment
>>>> what ICANN board. I don't see what we can stop ICG's action, isn't it?
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
More information about the Internal-cg