[Internal-cg] Consensus call: contracting/agreements
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Thu May 7 19:41:07 UTC 2015
The text is generalléy meets the concerns of everybody thus could sent today
2015-05-07 21:34 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:
> Current text for both the statement and the email are below. These include
> the edits suggested by Narelle, Kavouss, and Jean-Jacques. Thanks to all
> who have responded to the consensus call already.
> I think given the remaining open questions raised in the other thread
> regarding Bruce’s recent email, there are still good reasons for us to
> publish the statement and send the email. We can always publish a follow-up
> statement after we receive a response if we have more to say.
> ICG Statement on Contracts and Other Agreements
> As the development of the proposal for the IANA stewardship transition
> proceeds, the ICG notes that operational communities have begun discussions
> with ICANN concerning existing and future contracts and other agreements
> called for in their respective transition proposals.
> The ICG expects -- as it has from the very beginning of the transition
> process -- that all interested parties will express their opinions about
> the transition proposals openly, transparently, and within the community
> processes. This includes opinions about the provisions, principles, and
> mechanisms associated with contracts or other agreements between the
> communities and the IANA functions operator. In order to ensure that any
> final proposal complies with the principle of multistakeholder support, it
> is crucial that the opinions of the proposed contracted parties be shared
> within the community processes as early as possible.
> Email to Steve Crocker:
> Dear Steve,
> The ICG has noted that it would be beneficial for the transition process
> if ICANN could clarify its position related to the statement located at
> <insert link here>. Specifically, if ICANN takes issue with provisions in
> any of the draft proposals relating to contracts or other agreements, the
> ICG requests that those opinions be made public. You are kindly requested
> to examine the matter and inform us of your findings.
> Alissa Cooper on behalf of the ICG
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg