[Internal-cg] Use of ICG site for IANA IPR public comment
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Sun Aug 7 17:24:09 UTC 2016
It would be preferable that only one site( ICG) be indicated and not BOTH
Sent from my iPhone
> On 7 Aug 2016, at 19:05, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
> I agree, only issue is whether ICANN, which has a massive PR apparatus to publicize the public comment period, will point to this site or its own, or both.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> FWIW, I think this is a good idea, and what ICG [website] should be used for.
>>> On 5 Aug 2016, at 20:16, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> Collectively, the OCs, ICANN, and the IETF Trust have been working on a set
>> of contractual agreements to implement the requirement from the IANA
>> stewardship transition proposal that the IANA-related IPR be held by an entity
>> independent from the IANA functions operator. Those agreements are due to
>> go out for public comment next Thursday, August 11. The group would like to
>> know if we could use the ICG web site and secretariat services to host the call
>> for public comment on these documents. Because these agreements impact
>> all of the communities, and because ICANN and the IETF Trust are parties to
>> the agreements themselves, we were looking for a “neutral” place to host the
>> call for public comment and the ICG site seemed like a logical solution. This
>> would not require any work or input from the ICG as a body, just some
>> resources from the secretariat. The group working on the IPR agreements will
>> sort out how to process and analyze the comments, and that too will not
>> require any work from the ICG.
>>> Because time is short, we need to make a conclusion about where this call
>> for public comment will be hosted by Monday, Aug 8. I realize this is very
>> much a last-minute request and I apologize for that, but if anyone objects to
>> using the ICG site and secretariat for this purpose, please say so on the list
>> before 15:00 UTC on August 8.
>>> I have already been in touch with Jennifer about what would be required
>> here and she is looking into the details with her team.
>>> Many thanks,
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
More information about the Internal-cg