[Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26
Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk
Mon Feb 29 19:32:11 UTC 2016
Surely the accountability requirements will only be met if the CCWG-Accountability proposal is adopted? Until then it is a conditional agreement: if the draft proposal were to be adopted, it would meet the CWG-Stewardship's requirements. Put another way, if one or more Chartering Organisation were to reject (or, for that matter, the ICANN Board refused to adopt) there is no CCWG-Accountability proposal and therefore the conditionality has not been met.
We'll look silly if we send in the proposal a day or so before one of the Chartering Organisations rejected the draft...
From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa at cooperw.in]
Sent: 29 February 2016 17:59
To: Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk>
Cc: IANA etc etcCoordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk> wrote:
> Don't we need to wait for the Chartering Organisations to adopt?
No. The ICG proposal is explicit about this (on the front page and in every highlighted section). What we were waiting for was the CWG’s confirmation, and we received that. Our proposal was not conditioned on any action by the chartering organizations.
> Many a slip and all that... It is only a draft until then. The CWG-Stewardship endorsement is an important, but not a complete, condition.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper
> Sent: 29 February 2016 16:48
> To: IANA etc etcCoordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
> Subject: [Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26
> Dear all,
> We have received confirmation from the CWG that the CCWG proposal meets its requirements. Therefore, we are now in a position to approve our final proposal for transmission to NTIA via the ICANN Board. The final proposal, with edits made to the sections that previously referenced the CWG-CCWG dependency, is attached to this message in redline and clean form. They are also available on Dropbox:
> We will ask for the ICG’s approval of this final version on our March 1 call (12:00 UTC). Here is the proposed agenda for the call:
> 1. Approval of final transition proposal 2. Update on communications plans
> Feedback on the agenda is welcome.
More information about the Internal-cg