<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Joe,</div><div><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">Thank you very much for comments</span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">Nevertheless, there are issues that we, the ICG Liaison may bring to
your attention resulted from Supplement Report .As you know CCWG has scheduled
a f2f meeting on 04 March in Marrakesh. It would be good to reflect on the
supplement and we, the Liaisons report back the ICG comments.</span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">By the way the extraordinary/ devoted call for REC 11( and its impact on
<span> </span>Recs 1 and 2)was held today at 12,00
UTC, This meeting favorably considered the compromise package that I had
submitted( jointly prepared by me and Beckie Burr) .That compromise is being
posted on CCWG wikie / mailing list and Chartering Organizations are requested
to provide their final comment for another <span> </span>call scheduled on <span> </span>Monday 08 Feb </span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 6.75pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">Regards</span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 6.75pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">Kavouss </span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">

</font></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-02-04 14:25 GMT+01:00 Joseph Alhadeff <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com" target="_blank">joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    I'm fine with scheduling a call when you guys feel we are best
    positioned to have the answer of CWG.  That being said, I'm not sure
    what if any deliberation is needed if CWG says that their
    dependencies are satisfied.<br>
    <br>
    Joe<div><div class="h5"><br>
    <br>
    <div>On 2/4/2016 2:12 AM, Narelle Clark
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    </div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">
      
      
      <div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>The ICG certainly does not want to be
            the source of any delay.</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>I thought we were going to schedule a
            call for both before and after ICANN55?</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Then cancel or keep as applies.</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Narelle</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US"> Internal-cg
                  [<a href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org" target="_blank">mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org</a>] <b>On Behalf
                    Of </b>Alissa Cooper<br>
                  <b>Sent:</b> Thursday, 4 February 2016 7:48 AM<br>
                  <b>To:</b> IANA etc etcCoordination Group<br>
                  <b>Subject:</b> [Internal-cg] Fwd: [CCWG-ACCT] Update
                  on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval of WS1
                  Recommendations</span></p>
            </div>
          </div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          <p class="MsoNormal">Please take a look at the message below
            from the CCWG list as well as the formal statement from the
            co-chairs here: <a href="https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs</a></p>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">The CCWG is aiming to have its proposal
              ready for the chartering organizations to approve it
              before or during ICANN 55. In light of this, Mohamed,
              Patrik and I believe the ICG needs to do the following:</p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">(1) Plan to ask the CWG for
                confirmation that their requirements are met as soon as
                the CCWG proposal goes to the chartering orgs, and give
                the CWG a heads-up that we intend to do that so they can
                respond promptly.</p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">(2) Schedule an ICG call for March 1.
                Hopefully we will have heard back from the CWG by then
                and we can discuss approval of our final proposal then,
                but it will be before anyone is in transit to Marrakesh.
                We do not have to wait for the chartering orgs to finish
                our business. If the timeline slips, we can cancel this
                call when it gets closer to the date. (Alternatively we
                could confirm approval of our final proposal strictly
                via email, but I am assuming folks would prefer to do so
                on a call.)</p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">I would also like to ask the group to
                reconsider the idea of scheduling a conference call at
                the end of the ICANN week, if we can find a time with
                interpreter availability. If the CCWG timeline does slip
                a bit such that we have not yet gotten a response from
                the CWG by March 1, I do not want the ICG to be in a
                position of causing any additional delay. If we schedule
                a call at the end of the ICANN week to discuss approval
                of our final proposal, we have less risk of doing that.
                Otherwise it may get bumped to the week following ICANN
                55, even if the CCWG proposal gets forwarded to the
                ICANN Board during the meeting. I firmly believe that
                every single day matters at this point.</p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">Your thoughts on all of the above are
                much appreciated. </p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">Alissa</p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><br>
                <br>
              </p>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal">Begin forwarded message:</p>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>From: </span></b><span>Mathieu
                    Weill <<a href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr" target="_blank">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a>></span></p>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] TR:
                      Update on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval of
                      WS1 Recommendations</span></b></p>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>Date: </span></b><span>February
                    2, 2016 at 11:53:16 PM PST</span></p>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>To: </span></b><span>"CCWG
                    Accountability" <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org" target="_blank">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>></span></p>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Dear Colleagues,<span> </span></span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Please find
                      below for your information the note sent today to
                      the Chartering Organization chairs, in line with
                      our discussions during our meeting #82.<span> </span></span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">This will be
                      added to our correspondence section of the wiki.<span> </span></span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Best</span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Mathieu</span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>De :</span></b><span><span> </span></span><span>Mathieu
                          Weill [<a href="mailto:weill@afnic.fr" target="_blank"><span>mailto:weill@afnic.fr</span></a>]<span> </span><br>
                          <b>Envoyé :</b><span> </span>mercredi
                          3 février 2016 08:52<br>
                          <b>À :</b><span> </span>'James
                          Bladel'; 'Byron Holland'; 'Louis Lee'; 'Alan
                          Greenberg'; 'Thomas Schneider'; 'Lars-Johan
                          Liman'; 'Tripti Sinha'; 'Patrik Fältström';
                          'Alissa Cooper'; 'Mohamed El Bashir';
                          'Jonathan Robinson'; 'Lise Fuhr'<br>
                          <b>Cc :</b><span> </span>'David
                          Olive'; 'Steve Crocker'; 'Bruce Tonkin';
                          'Theresa Swinehart'; 'Thomas Rickert'; 'León
                          Felipe Sánchez Ambía'; 'ACCT-STAFF'<br>
                          <b>Objet :</b><span> </span>Update
                          on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval of WS1
                          Recommendations</span></p>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Dear all,</span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Yesterday,
                            the co-Chairs issued a<span> </span></span><span><a href="https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs" target="_blank"><span lang="EN-US">formal statement</span></a><span> </span></span><span lang="EN-US">updating the community on the
                            status of the Work Stream 1 Recommendations
                            and providing insight into the steps the
                            CCWG-Accountability will be taking in
                            developing the supplemental draft. </span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Our hope is that the
                            majority of changes from the Third Draft
                            Report will relate to specificities of
                            implementation rather than content, and as
                            such, an additional public comment period
                            will not be necessary before approval by the
                            Chartering Organizations.</span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>In light of progress
                            made and in assessing the outstanding
                            issues, we have announced a target to
                            distribute the supplemental report to our
                            Chartering Organizations in time for
                            consideration and approval on all Work
                            Stream 1 Recommendations during ICANN55 in
                            Marrakech. </span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>The various SOs and
                            ACs approach their work and schedules
                            differently and we are respectfully asking
                            that you take this into account as you plan
                            your discussions before and during ICANN55. </span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>With that said, we
                            encourage any Chartering Organizations that
                            can deliberate and/or approve the Work
                            Stream 1 Recommendations prior to Marrakech
                            to please do so.</span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>We are grateful for
                            your input on the Third Draft Report and for
                            your continued engagement in the development
                            of the revised Work Stream 1
                            Recommendations. We hope to continue this
                            open dialogue as the supplemental report is
                            finalized, and we are also hoping that all
                            potential issues have been raised to the
                            CCWG-Accountability so they can be mitigated
                            in our revisions. Our objective is to
                            provide the Chartering Organizations a
                            simple and straightforward approval process.</span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Following approval
                            from the Chartering Organizations, we have
                            asked the ICANN Board to be mindful of the
                            timeline as they plan their review period of
                            the Work Stream 1 Recommendations and
                            submission to NTIA.</span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>We have seen
                            increased involvement from the ICANN Board
                            as our work progressed since the Third Draft
                            Report. By enabling us to understand Board
                            comments in real-time, the following
                            potential global public interest concerns
                            stemming from the Board’s comments in
                            December, have been discussed:</span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <ul type="disc">
                      <li class="MsoNormal"><span>Inspection rights have
                          been fully addressed.</span></li>
                      <li class="MsoNormal"><span>Budget process
                          concerns have been fully addressed.</span></li>
                      <li class="MsoNormal"><span>Work Stream 2 concerns
                          have been fully addressed.</span></li>
                      <li class="MsoNormal"><span>Human rights concerns
                          have been discussed and the group has adjusted
                          its recommendation, however Board concerns
                          still exist.</span></li>
                      <li class="MsoNormal"><span>Concerns on ICANN’s
                          Mission are still being discussed.</span></li>
                    </ul>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>As always, please not
                            hesitate to reach out to us should you have
                            any questions or concerns.</span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Best regards,</span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Mathieu, Thomas, León</span></p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span>_______________________________________________<br>
                    Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
                  </span><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank"><span>Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</span></a><span><br>
                  </span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank"><span>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</span></a></p>
              </div>
            </div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <br>
      </div></div><span><pre>_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a>
<a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a>
</pre>
    </span></blockquote>
    <br>
  </div>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>